That's the question. I like the line of thinking of using truth or dare, to be quite honest - I think what Filbo said was smart. King's Cup itself gives us the widest breadth of options of all the ones we played before.
We could use the rule of the 'king' to add new rules to the game as we normally do, and bit by bit, we can build on the rules to our benefit during until we've successfully created something of a trap. It gives us a total of four kings, with an approximately 7.9% chance of drawing one, to build in a little bit of competitive edge. Let Satan build his own rules in the deck if he picks one - he can ultimately decide what he sees as harsh, based on his own perception. If we work with the idea of it being beneficial to him, lets trust him enough to work with us in a fair game.
To make it Satan's cup, why don't we add the jokers in? That's two extra cards. We could pin life or death on luck, so to speak; I'm open to suggestions for what to do with them.
no subject
We could use the rule of the 'king' to add new rules to the game as we normally do, and bit by bit, we can build on the rules to our benefit during until we've successfully created something of a trap. It gives us a total of four kings, with an approximately 7.9% chance of drawing one, to build in a little bit of competitive edge. Let Satan build his own rules in the deck if he picks one - he can ultimately decide what he sees as harsh, based on his own perception. If we work with the idea of it being beneficial to him, lets trust him enough to work with us in a fair game.
To make it Satan's cup, why don't we add the jokers in? That's two extra cards. We could pin life or death on luck, so to speak; I'm open to suggestions for what to do with them.